ACRNX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
ACRNX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 10, 1970. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | -9.00% | 4.80% | 14.46% | 21.85% | -33.80% | 8.62% | 29.65% | 26.65% | -8.82% | 25.22% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
ACRNX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACRNX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
ACRNX
CTCAX
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACRNX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 1.02 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.57 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.67 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 5.92 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACRNX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.02 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.49 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.82 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRNX and CTCAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 26.17% | 13.28% | 11.43% | 8.55% | 23.63% | 39.09% | 63.48% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRNX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -61.04% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -14.43% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.58% | -39.55% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -39.55% | -6.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.25% | -14.43% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -10.75% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 4.07% | +0.40% |
Volatility
ACRNX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) at 7.45%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACRNX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 7.45% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 16.24% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 27.00% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 25.81% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 24.66% | -1.78% |