ACRE vs. LFT
ACRE (Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation) and LFT (Lument Finance Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, ACRE returned 1.22%/yr vs -3.37%/yr for LFT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACRE vs. LFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRE achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than LFT's -26.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRE has outperformed LFT with an annualized return of 1.22%, while LFT has yielded a comparatively lower -3.37% annualized return.
ACRE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -7.58%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- -11.85%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 1.22%
LFT
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 6M
- -27.77%
- 1Y
- -54.81%
- 3Y*
- -8.68%
- 5Y*
- -15.79%
- 10Y*
- -3.37%
ACRE vs. LFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRE Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation | -0.26% | -7.92% | -34.00% | 15.56% | -20.44% | 34.30% | -13.84% | 32.33% | 10.33% | 1.93% |
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | -26.79% | -39.33% | 29.40% | 38.64% | -45.07% | 28.63% | 15.69% | 23.31% | -22.06% | -9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRE and LFT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2013 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
ACRE:
$255.59M
LFT:
$52.40M
ACRE:
-$0.36
LFT:
-$0.06
ACRE:
4.66
LFT:
0.92
ACRE:
0.52
LFT:
0.33
ACRE:
$54.71M
LFT:
$56.81M
ACRE:
$25.31M
LFT:
$63.50M
ACRE:
$30.62M
LFT:
$37.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACRE vs. LFT — Risk / Return Rank
ACRE
LFT
ACRE vs. LFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACRE | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.78 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | -1.00 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | -1.57 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACRE vs. LFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRE drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, smaller than the maximum LFT drawdown of -81.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRE and LFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRE | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.68% | -81.57% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.69% | -55.07% | +37.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -59.51% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.51% | -59.51% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.68% | -77.00% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.39% | -61.22% | +9.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -33.00% | +13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.71% | 34.92% | -26.21% |
Volatility
ACRE vs. LFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) is 10.73%, while Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that ACRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACRE | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.73% | 13.71% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.56% | 33.38% | -8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.57% | 47.45% | -9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 35.31% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.08% | 41.48% | +3.60% |
Dividends
ACRE vs. LFT - Dividend Comparison
ACRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%, less than LFT's 18.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRE Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation | 12.99% | 12.55% | 16.98% | 13.13% | 13.61% | 9.63% | 11.08% | 8.33% | 8.90% | 8.37% | 7.57% | 8.74% |
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | 18.00% | 15.60% | 15.50% | 11.16% | 12.63% | 9.38% | 11.16% | 9.13% | 9.79% | 13.75% | 41.20% | 24.73% |
Financials
ACRE vs. LFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ACRE and LFT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFT has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to ACRE (10.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACRE dropped -75.68% vs LFT's -81.57%.
ACRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACRE and LFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer