ACM vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACM (AECOM) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, ACM returned 8.98%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for MINT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

ACM vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AECOM (ACM) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACM achieves a -23.53% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ACM has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 8.98%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.

ACM

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -13.83%
• YTD: -23.53%
• 6M: -29.83%
• 1Y: -33.86%
• 3Y*: -2.70%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: 8.98%

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACM vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACM AECOM	-23.53%	-9.91%	16.67%	9.77%	10.72%	55.38%	15.42%	62.75%	-28.67%	2.17%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ACM and MINT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009	-0.03

The correlation between ACM and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACM vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACM

ACM Risk / Return Rank: 7
ACM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ACM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ACM Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ACM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ACM Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACM vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AECOM (ACM) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACM	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	17.09	-18.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.36	65.54	-66.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	20.53	-19.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	94.30	-95.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	939.26	-940.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACM vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACM Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACM and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACM	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.07	17.09	-18.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	5.99	-5.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	2.87	-2.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	2.47	-2.27

Drawdowns

ACM vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACM drawdown since its inception was -59.97%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACM and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACM	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.97%	-4.62%	-55.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.02%	-0.05%	-47.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.02%	-0.16%	-47.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.02%	-2.42%	-45.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.12%	-4.62%	-49.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.74%	0.00%	-45.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.45%	-0.17%	-18.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.02%	0.00%	+24.02%

Volatility

ACM vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

AECOM (ACM) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that ACM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACM	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.67%	0.09%	+14.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.16%	0.20%	+25.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.88%	0.27%	+31.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.66%	0.58%	+26.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.17%	0.95%	+30.22%

Dividends

ACM vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACM AECOM	1.57%	1.09%	0.82%	0.78%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACM and MINT in my portfolio?

ACM and MINT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACM or MINT?

ACM has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACM dropped -59.97% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.