PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACM vs. EXPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACM vs. EXPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AECOM (ACM) and Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACM achieves a -24.55% return, which is significantly lower than EXPO's -15.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACM having a 8.83% annualized return and EXPO not far ahead at 9.12%.


ACM

1D
-1.12%
1M
-15.05%
YTD
-24.55%
6M
-29.47%
1Y
-33.79%
3Y*
-3.13%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
8.83%

EXPO

1D
-3.31%
1M
-10.55%
YTD
-15.59%
6M
-19.60%
1Y
-23.03%
3Y*
-13.63%
5Y*
-6.83%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACM vs. EXPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACM
AECOM
-24.55%-9.91%16.67%9.77%10.72%55.38%15.42%62.75%-28.67%2.17%
EXPO
Exponent, Inc.
-15.59%-20.81%2.42%-10.14%-14.25%30.67%31.74%37.51%44.22%19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ACM and EXPO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACM:

$9.33B

EXPO:

$2.93B

EPS

ACM:

$3.82

EXPO:

$2.14

PE Ratio

ACM:

18.68

EXPO:

27.31

PEG Ratio

ACM:

0.11

EXPO:

12.94

PS Ratio

ACM:

0.59

EXPO:

6.81

PB Ratio

ACM:

4.11

EXPO:

8.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACM:

$15.99B

EXPO:

$436.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACM:

$1.24B

EXPO:

$95.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACM:

$976.83M

EXPO:

$153.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACM vs. EXPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACM
ACM Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ACM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACM Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ACM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACM Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

EXPO
EXPO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EXPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXPO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EXPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXPO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACM vs. EXPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AECOM (ACM) and Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACMEXPODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.06

-0.75

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.36

-1.03

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.88

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.69

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-1.79

+0.36

ACM vs. EXPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACM Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the EXPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACM and EXPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACMEXPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

-0.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.23

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.32

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.22

-0.03

Drawdowns

ACM vs. EXPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACM drawdown since its inception was -59.97%, smaller than the maximum EXPO drawdown of -86.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACM and EXPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACMEXPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.97%

-86.44%

+26.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.02%

-32.45%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.02%

-52.37%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.02%

-54.79%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.12%

-54.79%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.46%

-50.82%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-32.71%

+14.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.84%

12.42%

+11.42%

Volatility

ACM vs. EXPO - Volatility Comparison

AECOM (ACM) has a higher volatility of 14.53% compared to Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) at 12.64%. This indicates that ACM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACMEXPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

12.64%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.15%

25.30%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

30.92%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

30.04%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.17%

28.88%

+2.29%

Dividends

ACM vs. EXPO - Dividend Comparison

ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than EXPO's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACM
AECOM
1.60%1.09%0.82%0.78%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXPO
Exponent, Inc.
2.07%1.73%1.26%1.18%0.97%0.69%0.84%0.93%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.20%

Financials

ACM vs. EXPO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AECOM and Exponent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.80B
0
(ACM) Total Revenue
(EXPO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ACM and EXPO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACM has higher volatility (14.53%) compared to EXPO (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACM dropped -59.97% vs EXPO's -86.44%.

EXPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACM and EXPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer