ACM vs. PWR
Compare and contrast key facts about AECOM (ACM) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACM or PWR.
Correlation
The correlation between ACM and PWR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ACM vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ACM:
1.03
PWR:
2.08
ACM:
1.61
PWR:
2.84
ACM:
1.20
PWR:
1.37
ACM:
1.42
PWR:
4.35
ACM:
3.77
PWR:
13.14
ACM:
5.98%
PWR:
5.11%
ACM:
21.92%
PWR:
32.27%
ACM:
-59.97%
PWR:
-97.07%
ACM:
-7.57%
PWR:
-2.97%
Fundamentals
ACM:
$14.47B
PWR:
$48.63B
ACM:
$3.69
PWR:
$5.40
ACM:
29.61
PWR:
61.00
ACM:
1.11
PWR:
1.90
ACM:
$12.21B
PWR:
$17.12B
ACM:
$840.37M
PWR:
$2.26B
ACM:
$862.09M
PWR:
$1.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACM achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 6.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ACM has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 15.74%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 29.29% annualized return.
ACM
1.21%
-2.07%
20.95%
24.57%
17.20%
15.74%
PWR
6.41%
-0.04%
27.08%
68.18%
52.71%
29.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACM vs. PWR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ACM
PWR
ACM vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AECOM (ACM) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACM vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than PWR's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACM AECOM | 0.85% | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
ACM vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACM drawdown since its inception was -59.97%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACM and PWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACM vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AECOM (ACM) is 5.23%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that ACM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ACM vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities