PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLLY vs. PHIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Accelleron Industries AG ADR (ACLLY) and PHINIA Inc. (PHIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLLY achieves a 23.08% return, which is significantly lower than PHIN's 36.94% return.


ACLLY

1D
0.25%
1M
-15.16%
YTD
23.08%
6M
18.59%
1Y
47.18%
3Y*
60.93%
5Y*
10Y*

PHIN

1D
4.09%
1M
8.11%
YTD
36.94%
6M
48.25%
1Y
97.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ACLLY
Accelleron Industries AG ADR
23.08%56.70%69.48%30.22%
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
36.94%32.99%62.69%2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLLY and PHIN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACLLY:

$8.84B

PHIN:

$3.30B

EPS

ACLLY:

$4.29

PHIN:

$3.58

PE Ratio

ACLLY:

21.96

PHIN:

23.80

PEG Ratio

ACLLY:

1.15

PHIN:

1.28

PS Ratio

ACLLY:

3.87

PHIN:

0.94

PB Ratio

ACLLY:

18.52

PHIN:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACLLY:

$2.28B

PHIN:

$3.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACLLY:

$1.02B

PHIN:

$763.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACLLY:

$569.11M

PHIN:

$374.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLLY vs. PHIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLLY
ACLLY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ACLLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PHIN
PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accelleron Industries AG ADR (ACLLY) and PHINIA Inc. (PHIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACLLYPHINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.50

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

4.84

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

13.57

-8.97

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the PHIN Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLLY and PHIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLLY drawdown since its inception was -30.00%, smaller than the maximum PHIN drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLLY and PHIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLLYPHINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.00%

-34.71%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.13%

-20.37%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.09%

0.00%

-18.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-12.11%

+6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.28%

7.26%

+3.02%

Volatility

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Accelleron Industries AG ADR (ACLLY) is 7.38%, while PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that ACLLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLLYPHINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

11.75%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.17%

23.16%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.64%

29.92%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.04%

42.61%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.04%

42.61%

-1.57%

Dividends

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Dividend Comparison

ACLLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than PHIN's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ACLLY
Accelleron Industries AG ADR
1.99%1.94%2.95%4.04%
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
1.34%1.72%2.08%1.65%

Financials

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accelleron Industries AG ADR and PHINIA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M202120222023202420252026
654.31M
878.00M
(ACLLY) Total Revenue
(PHIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACLLY vs. PHIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Accelleron Industries AG ADR and PHINIA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%202120222023202420252026
43.9%
21.4%
Portfolio components
ACLLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accelleron Industries AG ADR reported a gross profit of 287.36M and revenue of 654.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.9%.

PHIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a gross profit of 188.00M and revenue of 878.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.

ACLLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accelleron Industries AG ADR reported an operating income of 159.35M and revenue of 654.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

PHIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported an operating income of 69.00M and revenue of 878.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

ACLLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accelleron Industries AG ADR reported a net income of 123.09M and revenue of 654.31M, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.

PHIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 878.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACLLY and PHIN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHIN has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to ACLLY (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLLY dropped -30.00% vs PHIN's -34.71%.

PHIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLLY and PHIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer