ACLC vs. SPTM
ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACLC is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACLC returned 10.97%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
ACLC vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.
ACLC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
ACLC vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.74% | 11.80% | 19.96% | 24.74% | -19.37% | 28.97% | 17.32% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLC and SPTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ACLC and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLC vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
ACLC
SPTM
ACLC vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.22 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 15.01 | -5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.36 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.80 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.46 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
ACLC vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -54.80% | +28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -8.68% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -18.87% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | -24.14% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.67% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -9.05% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 1.86% | +0.42% |
Volatility
ACLC vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 2.88% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 8.92% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 11.88% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 16.87% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 18.03% | -0.91% |
ACLC vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLC vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 0.72% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ACLC and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACLC has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 10.97% for ACLC. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACLC.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.56% for ACLC.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLC and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer