ACLC vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACLC returned 15.94% vs 302.60% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 8.34% return.

ACLC

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 7.21%
• 1M: 186.29%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: 302.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF	5.55%	11.80%	2.52%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	8.34%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLC and MSTZ is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.45

Return for Risk

ACLC vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLC

ACLC Risk / Return Rank: 38
ACLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ACLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ACLC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ACLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACLC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACLC	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.09	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.54	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	3.59	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	7.12	-0.46

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLC and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACLC	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.44%	-99.38%	+72.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.28%	-84.89%	+74.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-96.31%	+92.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-94.47%	+88.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	42.75%	-40.35%

Volatility

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) is 4.74%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.07%. This indicates that ACLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACLC	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	46.07%	-41.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	129.69%	-119.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	145.81%	-133.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	170.55%	-153.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	170.55%	-153.43%

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACLC vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF	0.55%	0.64%	0.89%	1.09%	1.10%	0.72%	0.43%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACLC and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ACLC and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACLC or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.07%) compared to ACLC (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ACLC or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 302.60% vs 15.94% for ACLC. On fees, ACLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ACLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACLC or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 302.60% return vs 15.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACLC or MSTZ?

ACLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACLC or MSTZ?

ACLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between ACLC and MSTZ?

ACLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.