PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACKY vs. RSPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACKY vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 27.76% return.


ACKY

1D
0.68%
1M
2.82%
6M
-5.51%
YTD
-1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPG

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.84%
6M
23.53%
YTD
27.76%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
21.24%
10Y*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and RSPG is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025

-0.20

ACKY vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACKY
RSPG

Consumer Cyclical

27.6%

-

Technology

27.4%

-

Financial Services

25.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ACKY
27.6%
RSPG

-

Technology

ACKY
27.4%
RSPG

-

Financial Services

ACKY
25.2%
RSPG
0.0%

Communication Services

ACKY
11.0%
RSPG

-

Real Estate

ACKY
9.6%
RSPG

-

Industrials

ACKY
0.2%
RSPG

-

Basic Materials

ACKY

-

RSPG

-

Consumer Defensive

ACKY

-

RSPG

-

Energy

ACKY

-

RSPG
100.0%

Healthcare

ACKY

-

RSPG

-

Utilities

ACKY

-

RSPG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACKY vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACKY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACKY vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACKYRSPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

ACKY vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and RSPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACKYRSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-79.98%

+65.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-10.24%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-25.39%

+21.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

Volatility

ACKY vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACKYRSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

21.90%

-6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

28.12%

-12.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

33.47%

-17.71%

ACKY vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACKY vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than RSPG's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF
13.38%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
2.08%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACKY and RSPG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ACKY.

ACKY has the higher dividend yield at 13.38%, compared with 2.08% for RSPG.

ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RSPG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 0.40% for RSPG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACKY and RSPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer