ACKY vs. NRGU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ACKY (VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - ACKY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). ACKY is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

ACKY vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.

ACKY

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: -4.64%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 18.77%
• 6M: 86.19%
• YTD: 118.00%
• 1Y: 119.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	-0.98%	4.04%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	118.00%	-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and NRGU is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	-0.24

ACKY vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACKY	NRGU
Consumer Cyclical	27.6%	-
Technology	27.4%	-
Financial Services	25.2%	-
Communication Services	11.0%	-
Real Estate	9.6%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ACKY vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACKY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 55
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACKY vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACKY	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.13	—

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACKY	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-57.50%	+42.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.67%	-24.81%	+20.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-26.06%	+22.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACKY	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	63.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.72%	76.98%	-61.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	89.07%	-73.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	89.07%	-73.35%

ACKY vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACKY and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

ACKY vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	13.26%	5.06%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACKY and NRGU in my portfolio?

ACKY and NRGU have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACKY or NRGU?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACKY or NRGU?

ACKY and NRGU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACKY or NRGU?

ACKY has the higher dividend yield at 13.26%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between ACKY and NRGU?

ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and BMO.