PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIW vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACIW vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIW achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ACIW has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


ACIW

1D
1.98%
1M
10.69%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-4.82%
1Y
0.38%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
8.12%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIW vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACIW
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
-5.38%-7.90%69.64%33.04%-33.72%-9.71%1.43%36.94%22.06%24.90%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIW and NFLX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.29

The correlation between ACIW and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACIW:

$4.65B

NFLX:

$345.34B

EPS

ACIW:

$1.99

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

ACIW:

22.79

NFLX:

25.99

PEG Ratio

ACIW:

1.02

NFLX:

1.03

PS Ratio

ACIW:

2.62

NFLX:

7.41

PB Ratio

ACIW:

3.10

NFLX:

11.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACIW:

$1.79B

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACIW:

$878.23M

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACIW:

$412.16M

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACIW vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIW
ACIW Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ACIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIW vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACIWNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.81

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.78

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

-1.35

+1.12

ACIW vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIW and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACIW vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIW drawdown since its inception was -90.10%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIW and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIWNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.10%

-81.99%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.25%

-43.35%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.02%

-43.35%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.40%

-75.95%

+26.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.18%

-75.95%

+21.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.58%

-40.01%

+16.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-24.91%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.26%

25.19%

-9.93%

Volatility

ACIW vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that ACIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIWNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

5.85%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.94%

24.58%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.82%

33.05%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.19%

43.09%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.67%

41.49%

-5.82%

Dividends

ACIW vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACIW nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ACIW vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
425.75M
12.25B
(ACIW) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACIW vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Netflix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
46.3%
51.9%
Portfolio components
ACIW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 197.29M and revenue of 425.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.

NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

ACIW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.49M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

ACIW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 38.31M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACIW and NFLX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIW has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIW dropped -90.10% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

ACIW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACIW and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer