PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIW vs. MSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACIW vs. MSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIW achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than MSI's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ACIW has underperformed MSI with an annualized return of 8.12%, while MSI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.65% annualized return.


ACIW

1D
1.98%
1M
10.69%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-4.82%
1Y
0.38%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
8.12%

MSI

1D
0.46%
1M
3.24%
YTD
7.83%
6M
13.71%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIW vs. MSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACIW
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
-5.38%-7.90%69.64%33.04%-33.72%-9.71%1.43%36.94%22.06%24.90%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
7.83%-16.17%49.12%23.04%-3.81%61.90%7.35%42.19%29.64%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIW and MSI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 1995

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between ACIW and MSI has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACIW:

$4.65B

MSI:

$69.26B

EPS

ACIW:

$1.99

MSI:

$12.42

PE Ratio

ACIW:

22.79

MSI:

33.20

PEG Ratio

ACIW:

1.02

MSI:

2.03

PS Ratio

ACIW:

2.62

MSI:

5.85

PB Ratio

ACIW:

3.10

MSI:

27.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACIW:

$1.79B

MSI:

$11.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACIW:

$878.23M

MSI:

$5.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACIW:

$412.16M

MSI:

$3.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACIW vs. MSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIW
ACIW Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ACIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MSI
MSI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIW vs. MSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACIWMSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.03

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

0.04

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

0.07

-0.30

ACIW vs. MSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the MSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIW and MSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACIW vs. MSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIW drawdown since its inception was -90.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MSI drawdown of -93.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIW and MSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIWMSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.10%

-93.60%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.25%

-25.45%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.02%

-27.01%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.40%

-27.23%

-22.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.18%

-32.81%

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.58%

-17.00%

-6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-40.70%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.26%

13.22%

+2.04%

Volatility

ACIW vs. MSI - Volatility Comparison

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) at 7.28%. This indicates that ACIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIWMSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

7.28%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.94%

19.70%

+7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.82%

23.76%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.19%

23.06%

+12.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.67%

25.15%

+10.52%

Dividends

ACIW vs. MSI - Dividend Comparison

ACIW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIW
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
0.85%1.17%0.87%1.16%1.26%1.07%1.55%1.46%1.85%2.14%2.05%2.09%

Financials

ACIW vs. MSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
425.75M
2.71B
(ACIW) Total Revenue
(MSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACIW vs. MSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
46.3%
50.2%
Portfolio components
ACIW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 197.29M and revenue of 425.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.

MSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

ACIW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.49M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

MSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 525.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.3%.

ACIW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 38.31M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

MSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorola Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACIW and MSI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIW has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to MSI (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIW dropped -90.10% vs MSI's -93.60%.

MSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACIW and MSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer