ACGR vs. SGRT
ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ACGR is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
ACGR vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACGR vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.39% | 6.99% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and SGRT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
SGRT
ACGR vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACGR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACGR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 3.81 | -3.11 |
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -17.87% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | 0.00% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -3.11% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility
ACGR vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 33.41% | -17.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 33.41% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 33.41% | -11.99% |
ACGR vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACGR vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACGR and SGRT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.
Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACGR and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for ACGR and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer