ACFOX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
ACFOX is managed by American Century. It was launched on May 31, 2006. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFOX American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund | -14.41% | 20.51% | 43.30% | 35.66% | -36.32% | 7.08% | 73.31% | 32.30% | 6.51% | -0.85% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACFOX achieves a -14.41% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
ACFOX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 16.85%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACFOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACFOX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
ACFOX
SWLGX
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACFOX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.66 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.72 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 2.51 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACFOX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.66 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.56 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.68 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACFOX and SWLGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
ACFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFOX American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund | 8.83% | 7.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 1.33% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACFOX drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFOX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACFOX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.92% | -32.69% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.52% | -16.16% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | -32.69% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.52% | -16.16% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -7.13% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 4.62% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ACFOX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that ACFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACFOX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.38% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 11.82% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 22.31% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 21.47% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 22.78% | +0.89% |