ACEP vs. BUFH
ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACEP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by ARS Investment Partners, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACEP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
ACEP vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEP achieves a 21.62% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.
ACEP
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACEP vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 21.62% | 8.00% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEP and BUFH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEP vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACEP vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEP drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEP and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEP | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -1.53% | -5.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -0.26% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -0.18% | -1.31% |
Volatility
ACEP vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEP | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 2.38% | +15.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 2.38% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 2.38% | +15.43% |
ACEP vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACEP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACEP vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
ACEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEP and BUFH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
ACEP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
ACEP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACEP and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for ACEP and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer