PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACCSX vs. RIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCSX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than RIBIX's -0.84% return.


ACCSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.43%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
0.95%

RIBIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ACCSX
Access Capital Community Investment Fund
0.24%8.02%0.62%4.13%-11.97%-0.98%3.87%6.16%-0.17%
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
-0.84%5.95%1.11%5.50%-14.47%-1.86%7.98%7.53%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCSX and RIBIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.89

The correlation between ACCSX and RIBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACCSX vs. RIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCSX
ACCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ACCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ACCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RIBIX
RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACCSXRIBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.12

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.86

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

2.53

+4.11

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the RIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCSX and RIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACCSXRIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.66

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.13

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.19

+0.09

Drawdowns

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCSX drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum RIBIX drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCSX and RIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACCSXRIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-19.37%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-3.29%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-6.20%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-18.98%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-6.21%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-6.43%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.12%

-0.16%

Volatility

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Volatility Comparison

Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that ACCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACCSXRIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

1.50%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

2.94%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

4.28%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

5.97%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

5.18%

-0.44%

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACCSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RIBIX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACCSX vs. RIBIX - Dividend Comparison

ACCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than RIBIX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACCSX
Access Capital Community Investment Fund
3.43%3.62%3.00%2.71%2.33%1.94%2.36%2.78%2.77%2.64%3.06%3.20%
RIBIX
RBC Impact Bond Fund
3.53%4.02%3.35%2.50%2.10%1.94%3.28%3.91%2.44%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ACCSX and RIBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACCSX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to RIBIX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCSX dropped -17.91% vs RIBIX's -19.37%.

ACCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACCSX and RIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer