PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACCSX vs. RGHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCSX achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RGHYX's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCSX has underperformed RGHYX with an annualized return of 0.95%, while RGHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.10% annualized return.


ACCSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
0.95%

RGHYX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.08%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACCSX
Access Capital Community Investment Fund
0.11%8.02%0.62%4.13%-11.97%-0.98%3.87%6.16%-0.17%1.75%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
1.67%9.02%7.14%12.88%-8.48%3.72%9.65%15.83%-0.73%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCSX and RGHYX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.20

Over the past year, ACCSX and RGHYX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACCSX vs. RGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCSX
ACCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ACCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ACCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RGHYX
RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) and RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACCSXRGHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.73

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

12.65

-7.25

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the RGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCSX and RGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCSX drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, roughly equal to the maximum RGHYX drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCSX and RGHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACCSXRGHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-17.38%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-2.65%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-4.01%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-12.79%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.91%

-17.38%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.10%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-1.47%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.57%

+0.46%

Volatility

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Volatility Comparison

Access Capital Community Investment Fund (ACCSX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) at 0.77%. This indicates that ACCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACCSXRGHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.77%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

2.15%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

2.65%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

4.39%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

4.67%

+0.08%

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACCSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RGHYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACCSX vs. RGHYX - Dividend Comparison

ACCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than RGHYX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACCSX
Access Capital Community Investment Fund
3.44%3.62%3.00%2.71%2.33%1.94%2.36%2.78%2.77%2.64%3.06%3.20%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
6.37%6.68%6.91%6.22%6.04%5.29%5.54%4.88%6.79%3.88%4.44%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACCSX and RGHYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACCSX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to RGHYX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCSX dropped -17.91% vs RGHYX's -17.38%.

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACCSX and RGHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer