ACCO vs. IBM
ACCO (ACCO Brands Corporation) and IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) are both stocks. ACCO operates in Business Equipment & Supplies (Industrials), while IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ACCO returned -5.61%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for IBM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACCO vs. IBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACCO achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -13.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCO has underperformed IBM with an annualized return of -5.61%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.
ACCO
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -9.31%
- 10Y*
- -5.61%
IBM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -13.74%
- 6M
- -15.61%
- 1Y
- -7.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
ACCO vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACCO ACCO Brands Corporation | 7.11% | -23.09% | -8.66% | 15.30% | -29.22% | 0.77% | -5.85% | 41.92% | -43.22% | -6.51% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -13.74% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACCO and IBM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2005 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ACCO and IBM shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACCO:
$364.81M
IBM:
$240.14B
ACCO:
$0.78
IBM:
$11.32
ACCO:
4.87
IBM:
22.28
ACCO:
0.23
IBM:
3.48
ACCO:
0.54
IBM:
7.28
ACCO:
$1.55B
IBM:
$68.91B
ACCO:
$507.20M
IBM:
$40.64B
ACCO:
$163.10M
IBM:
$15.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACCO vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank
ACCO
IBM
ACCO vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACCO | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.26 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -0.54 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACCO vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACCO drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCO and IBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACCO | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.63% | -69.40% | -28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.99% | -30.96% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.96% | -30.96% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.59% | -30.96% | -30.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.83% | -40.59% | -31.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.70% | -23.39% | -56.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.39% | -20.12% | -45.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.89% | 14.68% | -2.79% |
Volatility
ACCO vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is 8.84%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 22.72%. This indicates that ACCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACCO | IBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 22.72% | -13.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.04% | 35.13% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.94% | 39.96% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.83% | 27.28% | +11.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.45% | 26.67% | +14.78% |
Dividends
ACCO vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison
ACCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than IBM's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACCO ACCO Brands Corporation | 7.85% | 8.04% | 5.71% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.62% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.67% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
ACCO vs. IBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACCO Brands Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACCO vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison
ACCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACCO Brands Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.80M and revenue of 343.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
ACCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACCO Brands Corporation reported an operating income of 7.70M and revenue of 343.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
ACCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACCO Brands Corporation reported a net income of 19.40M and revenue of 343.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACCO and IBM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to ACCO (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCO dropped -97.63% vs IBM's -69.40%.
ACCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACCO and IBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer