PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACCO vs. EBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACCO vs. EBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCO achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCO has underperformed EBF with an annualized return of -5.61%, while EBF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.59% annualized return.


ACCO

1D
-1.03%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
7.67%
6M
10.63%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
-2.66%
5Y*
-10.48%
10Y*
-5.61%

EBF

1D
-2.75%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
14.80%
6M
15.50%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCO vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACCO
ACCO Brands Corporation
7.67%-23.09%-8.66%15.30%-29.22%0.77%-5.85%41.92%-43.22%-6.51%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
14.80%-9.96%12.59%3.64%19.38%14.78%-13.46%17.54%-2.77%24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCO and EBF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2005

0.47

Fundamentals

EPS

ACCO:

$0.78

EBF:

$2.44

PE Ratio

ACCO:

4.90

EBF:

8.25

PS Ratio

ACCO:

0.23

EBF:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACCO:

$1.55B

EBF:

$296.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACCO:

$507.20M

EBF:

$92.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACCO:

$163.10M

EBF:

$75.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACCO vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCO
ACCO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ACCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ACCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACCO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EBF
EBF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCO vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACCOEBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.23

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

2.92

-1.60

ACCO vs. EBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the EBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCO and EBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACCOEBFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

0.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.30

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.29

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.19

-0.30

Drawdowns

ACCO vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCO drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than EBF's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCO and EBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACCOEBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.63%

-73.10%

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.99%

-11.41%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.96%

-22.80%

-27.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.59%

-22.80%

-38.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

-35.32%

-36.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.60%

-8.81%

-70.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.37%

-20.58%

-44.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.99%

4.80%

+7.19%

Volatility

ACCO vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison

ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 5.42%. This indicates that ACCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACCOEBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

5.42%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.16%

16.36%

+14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.07%

22.00%

+19.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.84%

21.40%

+17.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.41%

26.26%

+15.15%

Dividends

ACCO vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison

ACCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than EBF's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACCO
ACCO Brands Corporation
7.81%8.04%5.71%4.93%5.37%3.27%3.08%2.62%3.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
4.96%5.55%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%11.67%3.64%

Financials

ACCO vs. EBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACCO Brands Corporation and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
343.70M
0
(ACCO) Total Revenue
(EBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ACCO and EBF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACCO has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to EBF (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCO dropped -97.63% vs EBF's -73.10%.

EBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACCO and EBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer