ACCO vs. IRM
Compare and contrast key facts about ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACCO or IRM.
Correlation
The correlation between ACCO and IRM is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ACCO vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ACCO:
-0.02
IRM:
2.16
ACCO:
0.22
IRM:
2.61
ACCO:
1.03
IRM:
1.37
ACCO:
-0.01
IRM:
2.92
ACCO:
-0.04
IRM:
12.69
ACCO:
17.73%
IRM:
4.64%
ACCO:
35.28%
IRM:
27.25%
ACCO:
-97.63%
IRM:
-55.71%
ACCO:
-75.13%
IRM:
-17.45%
Fundamentals
ACCO:
$532.21M
IRM:
$32.31B
ACCO:
-$1.90
IRM:
$0.36
ACCO:
0.43
IRM:
1.08
ACCO:
$1.71B
IRM:
$5.99B
ACCO:
$548.30M
IRM:
$2.94B
ACCO:
-$68.10M
IRM:
$2.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACCO achieves a -7.79% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 54.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCO has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of -2.45%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.00% annualized return.
ACCO
-7.79%
-6.19%
15.92%
-3.50%
-7.06%
-2.45%
IRM
54.47%
-9.05%
19.77%
56.55%
33.78%
17.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACCO vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACCO vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
ACCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than IRM's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACCO ACCO Brands Corporation | 5.66% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.62% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.33% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% | 6.05% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
ACCO vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACCO drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCO and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACCO vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) at 10.40%. This indicates that ACCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ACCO vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACCO Brands Corporation and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities