PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABWYX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABWYX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ABWYX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.


ABWYX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.67%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.25%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
6.27%

QBDSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
7.91%15.50%8.54%11.43%-19.60%13.27%5.11%19.72%-7.64%11.49%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.13%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ABWYX and QBDSX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.47

The correlation between ABWYX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (5 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABWYX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABWYX
ABWYX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ABWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ABWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABWYXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.61

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

1.71

+9.63

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABWYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABWYX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABWYXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.53

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.17

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.15

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.16

+0.34

Drawdowns

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABWYX drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABWYX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABWYXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-18.38%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-3.09%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-3.76%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.69%

-7.40%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.15%

-18.38%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-7.94%

+7.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-6.85%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.11%

+0.58%

Volatility

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.68%. This indicates that ABWYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABWYXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

0.68%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

2.38%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

3.59%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

4.32%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.55%

5.25%

+5.30%

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABWYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABWYX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

ABWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than QBDSX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
10.52%11.35%3.37%1.47%3.11%9.56%3.11%3.16%0.00%1.40%3.46%2.63%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.47%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABWYX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABWYX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to QBDSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABWYX dropped -46.27% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

ABWYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABWYX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer