PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABWYX vs. AGRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABWYX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than AGRFX's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ABWYX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.


ABWYX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.67%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.25%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
6.27%

AGRFX

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.61%
YTD
6.83%
6M
5.43%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
7.91%15.50%8.54%11.43%-19.60%13.27%5.11%19.72%-7.64%11.49%
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
6.83%10.84%31.50%37.95%-29.65%21.40%35.97%31.11%3.75%33.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ABWYX and AGRFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2003

0.86

The correlation between ABWYX and AGRFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABWYX vs. AGRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABWYX
ABWYX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ABWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ABWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AGRFX
AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABWYXAGRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.20

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.08

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

3.84

+7.49

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABWYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the AGRFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABWYX and AGRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABWYXAGRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.10

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.56

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Drawdowns

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABWYX drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, smaller than the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABWYX and AGRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABWYXAGRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-61.88%

+15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-15.92%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-22.08%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.69%

-35.21%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.15%

-35.21%

+9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.52%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-15.75%

+9.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

4.45%

-2.76%

Volatility

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) is 2.85%, while AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that ABWYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABWYXAGRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.53%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

11.93%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

15.61%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

20.85%

-10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.55%

20.46%

-9.91%

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABWYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABWYX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison

ABWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than AGRFX's 15.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
10.52%11.35%3.37%1.47%3.11%9.56%3.11%3.16%0.00%1.40%3.46%2.63%
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
15.33%16.37%21.03%7.20%1.69%9.79%5.79%7.80%16.01%9.33%1.03%9.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABWYX and AGRFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRFX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ABWYX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABWYX dropped -46.27% vs AGRFX's -61.88%.

ABWYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABWYX and AGRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer