PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABUAX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio (ABUAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABUAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio
-3.66%15.60%10.28%14.82%-17.18%9.51%11.92%18.24%-6.81%14.87%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
7.48%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABUAX achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ABUAX has underperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 6.49%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.10% annualized return.


ABUAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.49%

TPDAX

1D
0.05%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
7.48%
6M
12.53%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABUAX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABUAX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABUAX
ABUAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ABUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ABUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio (ABUAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABUAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

2.07

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

2.68

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.33

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.87

12.75

-5.88

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABUAX and TPDAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABUAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.07

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.95

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.72

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.58

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABUAX and TPDAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

ABUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than TPDAX's 0.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABUAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio
4.49%4.67%5.24%4.17%5.92%13.22%5.18%5.94%7.23%6.48%3.06%6.87%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.75%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABUAX drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABUAX and TPDAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABUAXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.71%

-22.29%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-7.58%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-17.58%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.76%

-22.29%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-6.56%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-4.94%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.98%

-0.40%

Volatility

ABUAX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Portfolio (ABUAX) is 3.71%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that ABUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABUAXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.00%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.16%

9.73%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

12.21%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.72%

10.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.73%

9.86%

-0.13%