ABR vs. CIM
ABR (Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.) and CIM (Chimera Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, ABR returned 7.94%/yr vs -1.39%/yr for CIM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABR vs. CIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABR achieves a -28.48% return, which is significantly lower than CIM's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ABR has outperformed CIM with an annualized return of 7.94%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively lower -1.39% annualized return.
ABR
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -28.48%
- 6M
- -30.37%
- 1Y
- -42.45%
- 3Y*
- -18.47%
- 5Y*
- -12.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
CIM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- -11.82%
- 10Y*
- -1.39%
ABR vs. CIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | -28.48% | -36.65% | 3.16% | 29.73% | -20.73% | 39.42% | 10.04% | 55.19% | 30.04% | 26.60% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 10.78% | -0.65% | 3.61% | 2.95% | -57.95% | 60.73% | -42.97% | 27.65% | 7.71% | 17.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABR and CIM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2007 | 0.44 |
The correlation between ABR and CIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABR:
$1.10B
CIM:
$1.11B
ABR:
$0.57
CIM:
$0.23
ABR:
9.07
CIM:
56.88
ABR:
1.17
CIM:
2.20
ABR:
0.47
CIM:
0.45
ABR:
$940.70M
CIM:
$499.18M
ABR:
$829.57M
CIM:
$465.68M
ABR:
$878.83M
CIM:
$439.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABR vs. CIM — Risk / Return Rank
ABR
CIM
ABR vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABR | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.09 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 0.52 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 1.27 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABR vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABR drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than CIM's maximum drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABR and CIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABR | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.76% | -89.69% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.82% | -18.18% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.55% | -35.80% | -23.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.55% | -69.09% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.76% | -72.35% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.76% | -59.51% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.88% | -51.75% | +9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.02% | 7.48% | +21.54% |
Volatility
ABR vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) at 5.94%. This indicates that ABR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABR | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 5.94% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.80% | 17.77% | +16.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.31% | 25.07% | +16.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.13% | 35.22% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.46% | 36.49% | +3.97% |
Dividends
ABR vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison
ABR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.58%, more than CIM's 11.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | 20.58% | 17.14% | 12.42% | 11.07% | 11.68% | 7.53% | 8.67% | 7.94% | 11.22% | 8.33% | 8.31% | 8.11% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 11.75% | 11.91% | 10.14% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 8.12% | 14.34% | 28.15% |
Financials
ABR vs. CIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABR and CIM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABR has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to CIM (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABR dropped -97.76% vs CIM's -89.69%.
CIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABR and CIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer