PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNFX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNFX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than GFFFX's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ABNFX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.12% annualized return.


ABNFX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.12%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.90%

GFFFX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.23%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.82%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
16.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
-0.07%7.42%1.42%4.29%-13.08%-0.88%10.86%8.08%0.15%3.48%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.30%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNFX and GFFFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

-0.10

The correlation between ABNFX and GFFFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNFX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNFX
ABNFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ABNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNFXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.86

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

7.26

-2.44

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNFX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNFXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.68

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.61

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.82

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Drawdowns

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNFX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, smaller than the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNFX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNFXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-36.26%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-13.74%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-21.55%

+15.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-36.26%

+18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.69%

-36.26%

+18.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.12%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-5.57%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

3.51%

-2.47%

Volatility

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) is 1.38%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that ABNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNFXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

3.84%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

11.66%

-8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

15.17%

-11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

20.25%

-14.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

19.69%

-14.80%

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNFX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

ABNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than GFFFX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.39%4.37%4.55%3.19%2.37%2.07%5.15%3.72%2.65%2.10%2.31%2.24%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.02%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNFX and GFFFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFFFX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to ABNFX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNFX dropped -17.69% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

GFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNFX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer