GFFFX vs. VUG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFFFX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GFFFX is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GFFFX returned 16.52%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for VUG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GFFFX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.

Performance

GFFFX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFFFX achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GFFFX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 16.52%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.02% annualized return.

GFFFX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 7.92%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 16.52%

VUG

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 20.05%
• 3Y*: 22.74%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 18.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFFFX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2	8.83%	19.96%	28.28%	37.51%	-30.61%	19.55%	38.16%	28.43%	-2.96%	26.38%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	3.52%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GFFFX and VUG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.96

The correlation between GFFFX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GFFFX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFFFX

GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 30
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 31
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFFFX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFFFX	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.19	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.67	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	1.22	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	4.15	+2.63

GFFFX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFFFX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFFFX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFFFX drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFFFX and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFFFX	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-50.68%	+14.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.74%	-16.53%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.55%	-22.85%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.26%	-35.61%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.26%	-35.61%	-0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-6.88%	+5.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-7.09%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	4.84%	-1.26%

Volatility

GFFFX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 6.79% and 6.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFFFX	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	6.86%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	13.44%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	16.91%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	22.39%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.78%	21.51%	-1.73%

GFFFX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFFFX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFFFX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

GFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2	10.06%	10.95%	9.23%	7.64%	4.32%	8.42%	4.51%	7.38%	12.29%	7.27%	6.87%	9.13%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFFFX and VUG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GFFFX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GFFFX or VUG?

VUG has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to GFFFX (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFFFX dropped -36.26% vs VUG's -50.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.