ABLS vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 9.52% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

ABLS vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.

ABLS

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 11.02%
• 6M: 7.56%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLS vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	11.02%	-3.88%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and RBIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

ABLS vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 16
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLS	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	4.18	-3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	6.39	-5.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	2.06	-0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	7.59	-7.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	44.07	-42.43

ABLS vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLS and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLS	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-0.52%	-18.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-0.52%	-15.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.51%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-0.07%	-8.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.81%	0.09%	+5.72%

Volatility

ABLS vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ABLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLS	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	0.36%	+4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	0.85%	+12.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	0.95%	+16.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	1.07%	+20.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	1.07%	+20.13%

ABLS vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLS vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	12.66%	14.04%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLS and RBIL in my portfolio?

ABLS and RBIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLS or RBIL?

ABLS has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, ABLS or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, ABLS leads with 9.52% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLS or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, ABLS has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLS or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLS or RBIL?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 12.66%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between ABLS and RBIL?

ABLS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.