ABLS vs. CSB
ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ABLS tracks the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index while CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 0.04% vs 17.95% for CSB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
ABLS vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return.
ABLS
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 0.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
ABLS vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 2.75% | -8.72% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLS and CSB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ABLS and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLS vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
ABLS
CSB
ABLS vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABLS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.22 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 2.51 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 7.26 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABLS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 1.25 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.45 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
ABLS vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -42.07% | +22.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -7.18% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -3.12% | -3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -7.14% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 2.48% | +3.34% |
Volatility
ABLS vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that ABLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABLS | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 3.59% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 9.19% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 14.54% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 18.78% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 21.31% | -0.06% |
ABLS vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABLS vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.68%, more than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 13.68% | 14.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABLS and CSB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABLS has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 1-year performance, CSB leads with 17.95% vs 0.04% for ABLS. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSB has performed better with a 17.95% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABLS.
ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 3.26% for CSB.
ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.35% for CSB.
CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABLS and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer