ABLS vs. ABXB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and ABXB (Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while ABXB is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 0.04% vs 5.34% for ABXB. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for ABXB.

Performance

ABLS vs. ABXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than ABXB's 0.19% return.

ABLS

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 0.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABXB

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 6.41%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLS vs. ABXB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	2.75%	-8.72%
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	0.19%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and ABXB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

ABLS vs. ABXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 9
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

ABXB

ABXB Risk / Return Rank: 41
ABXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ABXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ABXB Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ABXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABXB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. ABXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABLS	ABXB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	1.54	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	2.18	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.28	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	1.56	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.01	5.28	-5.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABLS vs. ABXB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the ABXB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLS and ABXB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABLS	ABXB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	1.54	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.24	-0.47

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. ABXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than ABXB's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and ABXB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLS	ABXB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-16.96%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-3.43%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-1.60%	-4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.45%	-5.73%	-2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.82%	1.01%	+4.81%

Volatility

ABLS vs. ABXB - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF (ABXB) at 0.98%. This indicates that ABLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABXB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLS	ABXB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	0.98%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	2.74%	+9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.35%	3.48%	+13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	5.59%	+15.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	5.44%	+15.81%

ABLS vs. ABXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ABXB's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLS vs. ABXB - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.68%, more than ABXB's 5.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	13.68%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ABXB Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF	5.20%	5.50%	15.35%	4.79%	3.18%	3.40%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLS and ABXB in my portfolio?

ABLS and ABXB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLS or ABXB?

ABLS has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to ABXB (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs ABXB's -16.96%.

Which ETF is better, ABLS or ABXB?

On 1-year performance, ABXB leads with 5.34% vs 0.04% for ABLS. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABXB has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLS or ABXB?

Over the 1-year period, ABXB has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLS or ABXB?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for ABXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLS or ABXB?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 5.20% for ABXB.

What is the main difference between ABLS and ABXB?

ABLS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ABXB is Nontraditional Bonds. ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while ABXB tracks Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.62% for ABXB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.