ABLD vs. USFR
ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABLD returned 12.75%/yr vs 4.76%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ABLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
ABLD vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return.
ABLD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
ABLD vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 8.60% | 6.64% | 7.05% | 18.89% | 7.42% | 3.86% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLD and USFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLD vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
ABLD
USFR
ABLD vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -49.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 13.43 | -12.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 203.42 | -202.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 787.84 | -783.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 15.11 | -14.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.60 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
ABLD vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -1.36% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | -0.02% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -0.06% | -19.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | 0.00% | -7.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -0.16% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 0.01% | +3.35% |
Volatility
ABLD vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 0.06% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 0.18% | +12.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 0.27% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 0.40% | +17.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 0.81% | +16.71% |
ABLD vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABLD vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 4.20% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABLD and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABLD has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 3-year performance, ABLD leads with 12.75% vs 4.76% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ABLD has performed better with a 12.75% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABLD.
ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.
ABLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLD and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABLD and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer