PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLD vs. DVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABLD vs. DVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than DVLU's 16.38% return.


ABLD

1D
0.58%
1M
3.74%
6M
1.27%
YTD
9.19%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.46%

DVLU

1D
1.30%
1M
5.20%
6M
13.95%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
41.19%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$251.36K$270.10K$369.63K
$183.55K$173.51K$204.38K

ABLD vs. DVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
9.19%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
16.38%23.67%13.36%18.84%-9.73%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and DVLU is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.77

The correlation between ABLD and DVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABLD vs. DVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABLD
ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABLD vs. DVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABLDDVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.38

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

12.32

-9.65

ABLD vs. DVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the DVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and DVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. DVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum DVLU drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and DVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLDDVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-53.26%

+33.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-12.24%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-24.86%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.80%

-0.10%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-8.61%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.35%

+1.66%

Volatility

ABLD vs. DVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is 2.51%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that ABLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABLDDVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

4.30%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

12.00%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

16.47%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

21.14%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

25.60%

-8.25%

ABLD vs. DVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DVLU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABLD vs. DVLU - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than DVLU's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
3.52%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.65%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABLD and DVLU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVLU has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to ABLD (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs DVLU's -53.26%.

On 3-year performance, DVLU leads with 20.69% vs 10.25% for ABLD. On fees, ABLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DVLU has performed better with a 20.69% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVLU.

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.65% for DVLU.

ABLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DVLU is Momentum. ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while DVLU tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLD and 0.60% for DVLU.

DVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABLD and DVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer