ABI vs. SOFR
ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, ABI returned 5.40% vs 3.85% for SOFR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.
Performance
ABI vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABI achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 1.91% return.
ABI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABI vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 3.24% | 2.05% |
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 1.91% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABI and SOFR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABI vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank
ABI
SOFR
ABI vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABI | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.04 | 3.30 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 9.52 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | 38.56 | -21.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABI vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and SOFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABI | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -0.41% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -0.41% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.03% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.10% | +0.21% |
Volatility
ABI vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) has a higher volatility of 0.35% compared to Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) at 0.20%. This indicates that ABI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABI | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.20% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.82% | 0.59% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 0.85% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 0.83% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 0.83% | +0.43% |
ABI vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABI vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison
ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than SOFR's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 6.20% | 3.01% | 0.00% |
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 3.89% | 4.22% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABI and SOFR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABI has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to SOFR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABI dropped -0.95% vs SOFR's -0.41%.
On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.40% vs 3.85% for SOFR. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.40% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.20%, compared with 3.89% for SOFR.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 0.20% for SOFR.
SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 4.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABI and SOFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer