ABI vs. QQQN
ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by VictoryShares, while QQQN is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. ABI is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.
Performance
ABI vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ABI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.10%
QQQN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.97K | $2.86K | $3.58K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ABI vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 2.33% |
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABI vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank
ABI
QQQN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABI vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABI | QQQN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABI vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and QQQN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABI | QQQN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | 0.00% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
ABI vs. QQQN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABI | QQQN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 0.00% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 0.00% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 0.00% | +1.24% |
ABI vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABI vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison
ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 6.18% | 3.01% |
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.
ABI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while QQQN is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 0.18% for QQQN.
Find the right allocation for ABI and QQQN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer