ABI vs. HFSI
ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) and HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HFSI.
Performance
ABI vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABI achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than HFSI's 1.38% return.
ABI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFSI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABI vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 2.61% | 2.05% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.38% | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABI and HFSI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABI vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank
ABI
HFSI
ABI vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABI | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.98 | 0.55 | +3.43 |
Drawdowns
ABI vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABI drawdown since its inception was -0.95%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI and HFSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABI | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -19.34% | +18.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.20% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -5.72% | +5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
ABI vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABI | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 3.58% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 4.97% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 4.97% | -3.69% |
ABI vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABI vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison
ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than HFSI's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 5.18% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.54% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABI and HFSI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HFSI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HFSI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 5.18% for ABI.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ABI and 0.49% for HFSI.
Find the right allocation for ABI and HFSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer