ABHY vs. CXRN
ABHY (Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABHY is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Abacus, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ABHY returned 5.34% vs -23.31% for CXRN. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. ABHY charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.
Performance
ABHY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.
ABHY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- -23.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABHY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF | 0.19% | 8.73% | -0.83% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.42% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABHY and CXRN is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABHY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
ABHY
CXRN
ABHY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | -0.64 | +2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | -0.73 | +2.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.91 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | -0.93 | +2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | -1.67 | +6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.64 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.61 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
ABHY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -46.71% | +29.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -25.27% | +21.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -46.16% | +44.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -30.08% | +24.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 13.97% | -12.96% |
Volatility
ABHY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 0.98%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 15.39% | -14.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 26.75% | -24.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 36.32% | -32.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 36.90% | -31.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 36.90% | -31.46% |
ABHY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABHY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than CXRN's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABHY Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF | 5.20% | 5.50% | 15.35% | 4.79% | 3.18% | 3.40% | 0.37% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.61% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABHY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to ABHY (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABHY dropped -16.96% vs CXRN's -46.71%.
On 1-year performance, ABHY leads with 5.34% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, ABHY is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ABHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABHY has performed better with a 5.34% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABHY is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
ABHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 2.61% for CXRN.
ABHY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ABHY and 0.95% for CXRN.
ABHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABHY and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer