PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABHY vs. CXRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABHY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABHY achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.


ABHY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*

CXRN

1D
-4.40%
1M
-21.78%
YTD
-13.42%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
-23.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABHY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
0.19%8.73%-0.83%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-13.42%-25.68%7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ABHY and CXRN is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABHY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABHY
ABHY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ABHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ABHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABHY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABHYCXRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

-0.64

+2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

-0.73

+2.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.91

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

-0.93

+2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

-1.67

+6.95

ABHY vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABHY and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABHYCXRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

-0.64

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.61

+0.85

Drawdowns

ABHY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABHY drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABHY and CXRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABHYCXRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-46.71%

+29.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-25.27%

+21.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-46.16%

+44.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-30.08%

+24.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

13.97%

-12.96%

Volatility

ABHY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF (ABHY) is 0.98%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that ABHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABHYCXRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

15.39%

-14.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

26.75%

-24.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

36.32%

-32.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

36.90%

-31.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

36.90%

-31.46%

ABHY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABHY has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABHY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

ABHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than CXRN's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABHY
Abacus Tactical High Yield ETF
5.20%5.50%15.35%4.79%3.18%3.40%0.37%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.61%3.30%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABHY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to ABHY (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABHY dropped -16.96% vs CXRN's -46.71%.

On 1-year performance, ABHY leads with 5.34% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, ABHY is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ABHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ABHY has performed better with a 5.34% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABHY is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.

ABHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 2.61% for CXRN.

ABHY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ABHY and 0.95% for CXRN.

ABHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABHY and CXRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer