ABEQ vs. CGVV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) and CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABEQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGVV.

Performance

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEQ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than CGVV's 11.52% return.

ABEQ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

CGVV

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	3.44%	5.51%
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	11.52%	6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEQ and CGVV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

ABEQ vs. CGVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABEQ	CGVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABEQ	CGVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.50	-0.94

Drawdowns

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than CGVV's maximum drawdown of -10.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEQ and CGVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEQ	CGVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.82%	-10.11%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.43%	-1.10%	-6.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-1.66%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABEQ	CGVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.91%	13.50%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.81%	13.50%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	13.50%	+0.34%

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CGVV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABEQ vs. CGVV - Dividend Comparison

ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than CGVV's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.21%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	0.51%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEQ and CGVV in my portfolio?

ABEQ and CGVV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABEQ or CGVV?

On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABEQ or CGVV?

CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABEQ or CGVV?

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.

What is the main difference between ABEQ and CGVV?

They also come from different issuers: Absolute Investment Advisers LLC and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ABEQ and 0.33% for CGVV.