ABCS vs. IJH
ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - ABCS tracks the BNY Mellon ABC Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABCS returned 16.85% vs 25.45% for IJH. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ABCS charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
ABCS vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.10% return.
ABCS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
ABCS vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | 6.97% | 7.95% | 14.47% | 1.97% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.10% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCS and IJH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ABCS and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
ABCS vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ABCS
IJH
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
ABCS
IJH
Healthcare
ABCS
IJH
Technology
ABCS
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
ABCS
IJH
Industrials
ABCS
IJH
Energy
ABCS
IJH
Real Estate
ABCS
IJH
Consumer Defensive
ABCS
IJH
Utilities
ABCS
IJH
Basic Materials
ABCS
IJH
Communication Services
ABCS
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABCS vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
ABCS
IJH
ABCS vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCS | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.65 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.41 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.90 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 10.60 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCS | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.65 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.46 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ABCS vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCS | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.52% | -55.07% | +34.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -8.83% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.12% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -7.57% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.41% | +0.23% |
Volatility
ABCS vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 2.66%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABCS | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 4.37% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 11.32% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 15.54% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 19.74% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 21.18% | -4.09% |
ABCS vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ABCS vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | 1.26% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABCS and IJH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJH has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to ABCS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 1-year performance, IJH leads with 25.45% vs 16.85% for ABCS. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IJH has performed better with a 25.45% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for ABCS.
ABCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
ABCS tracks BNY Mellon ABC Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABCS and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer