ABBV vs. GWW
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 18.63%/yr vs 21.17%/yr for GWW. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 29.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 18.63%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.17% annualized return.
ABBV
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
GWW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 29.79%
- 6M
- 36.56%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- 24.53%
- 10Y*
- 21.17%
ABBV vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | -0.77% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 29.79% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and GWW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.25 |
The correlation between ABBV and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABBV:
$395.73B
GWW:
$61.84B
ABBV:
$2.05
GWW:
$37.26
ABBV:
108.68
GWW:
35.01
ABBV:
6.30
GWW:
3.39
ABBV:
14.39
GWW:
15.73
ABBV:
$62.82B
GWW:
$18.38B
ABBV:
$46.15B
GWW:
$7.20B
ABBV:
$17.96B
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
GWW
ABBV vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABBV | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 2.60 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABBV | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.82 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.00 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.74 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.56 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -56.73% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -15.00% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -24.50% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -24.50% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -41.60% | -3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | 0.00% | -6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -11.01% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 8.29% | -0.57% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 4.56%. This indicates that ABBV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 4.56% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.89% | 18.19% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 24.80% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 24.67% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 28.54% | -2.80% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than GWW's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.02% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
Financials
ABBV vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABBV vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and GWW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to GWW (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs GWW's -56.73%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer