PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABAT vs. UAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABAT vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABAT achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 40.24% return.


ABAT

1D
-1.17%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
1.20%
6M
-17.36%
1Y
146.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UAMY

1D
-3.96%
1M
-29.39%
YTD
40.24%
6M
25.71%
1Y
133.11%
3Y*
174.60%
5Y*
49.67%
10Y*
39.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABAT vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ABAT
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock
1.20%35.77%-47.55%-60.25%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
40.24%183.62%610.84%-32.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ABAT and UAMY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.35

Over the past year, ABAT and UAMY have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABAT:

$445.67M

UAMY:

$996.95M

EPS

ABAT:

-$0.55

UAMY:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

ABAT:

24.13

UAMY:

23.26

PB Ratio

ABAT:

3.95

UAMY:

7.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABAT:

$16.28M

UAMY:

$39.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABAT:

-$6.95M

UAMY:

$4.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABAT:

-$62.40M

UAMY:

-$15.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABAT vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABAT
ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABAT vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABATUAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.80

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

3.10

-0.43

ABAT vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABAT and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABAT vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABAT drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABAT and UAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABATUAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-96.44%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.85%

-74.30%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.36%

-59.70%

-11.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.65%

-66.41%

-11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.23%

43.23%

+12.00%

Volatility

ABAT vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) has a higher volatility of 41.35% compared to United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) at 30.55%. This indicates that ABAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABATUAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.35%

30.55%

+10.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.28%

93.03%

-21.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.65%

132.02%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

122.60%

95.07%

+27.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.60%

101.02%

+21.58%

Dividends

ABAT vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABAT nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ABAT vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Battery Technology Company Common Stock and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00M12.00M14.00M20222023202420252026
7.81M
6.78M
(ABAT) Total Revenue
(UAMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABAT and UAMY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABAT has higher volatility (41.35%) compared to UAMY (30.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABAT dropped -93.56% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

ABAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABAT and UAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer