ABAT vs. LYSDY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ABAT (American Battery Technology Company Common Stock) and LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, ABAT returned 146.72% vs 118.23% for LYSDY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABAT achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 52.00% return.

ABAT

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: -17.36%
• 1Y: 146.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LYSDY

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -12.53%
• YTD: 52.00%
• 6M: 49.64%
• 1Y: 118.23%
• 3Y*: 33.48%
• 5Y*: 23.19%
• 10Y*: 74.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ABAT American Battery Technology Company Common Stock	1.20%	35.77%	-47.55%	-60.25%
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	52.00%	109.37%	-18.22%	7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ABAT and LYSDY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap ABAT : $445.67M LYSDY : $12.36B
EPS ABAT : -$0.55 LYSDY : A$0.14
PS Ratio ABAT : 24.13 LYSDY : 14.42
PB Ratio ABAT : 3.95 LYSDY : 5.23
Total Revenue (TTM) ABAT : $16.28M LYSDY : A$1.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) ABAT : -$6.95M LYSDY : A$301.27M
EBITDA (TTM) ABAT : -$62.40M LYSDY : A$236.57M

Return for Risk

ABAT vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABAT

ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 75
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 82
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABAT	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.83	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.29	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.56	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.67	5.33	-2.67

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABAT and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABAT drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABAT and LYSDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABAT	LYSDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.56%	-99.93%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.85%	-46.39%	-31.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-46.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-58.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.36%	-54.54%	-16.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.65%	-84.48%	+6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.23%	22.25%	+32.98%

Volatility

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) has a higher volatility of 41.35% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 17.37%. This indicates that ABAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABAT	LYSDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.35%	17.37%	+23.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.28%	43.70%	+27.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.65%	64.99%	+66.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	122.60%	50.64%	+71.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	122.60%	278.55%	-155.95%

Dividends

ABAT vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABAT nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABAT and LYSDY in my portfolio?

ABAT and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABAT or LYSDY?

ABAT has higher volatility (41.35%) compared to LYSDY (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABAT dropped -93.56% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.