PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABALX vs. JDBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABALX achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than JDBAX's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ABALX has underperformed JDBAX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while JDBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.


ABALX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.97%
YTD
9.98%
6M
10.60%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
10.12%

JDBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.13%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.83%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.98%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
3.84%14.78%20.54%15.17%-16.75%16.99%14.14%25.01%0.39%18.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ABALX and JDBAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2005

0.93

The correlation between ABALX and JDBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABALX vs. JDBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

JDBAX
JDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABALXJDBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.32

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.89

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.45

8.15

+8.30

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the JDBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABALX and JDBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABALXJDBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

1.77

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.78

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.98

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Drawdowns

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABALX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than JDBAX's maximum drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABALX and JDBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABALXJDBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-34.14%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-8.16%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-11.96%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-21.63%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-22.48%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-5.38%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.89%

-0.34%

Volatility

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) at 2.46%. This indicates that ABALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABALXJDBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.46%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.94%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

8.71%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

11.34%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

11.27%

-0.60%

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABALX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than JDBAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABALX vs. JDBAX - Dividend Comparison

ABALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, less than JDBAX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.54%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
8.34%8.62%11.67%2.08%1.76%4.34%2.35%4.62%6.84%5.05%2.43%5.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ABALX and JDBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ABALX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to JDBAX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABALX dropped -40.20% vs JDBAX's -34.14%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABALX and JDBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer