PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AB vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AB vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AB achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, AB has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 14.11%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.59% annualized return.


AB

1D
-1.13%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-5.60%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
14.11%

NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AB vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-2.07%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AB and NVDA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between AB and NVDA has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AB:

$3.33B

NVDA:

$5.18T

EPS

AB:

$3.22

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

AB:

11.19

NVDA:

32.56

PS Ratio

AB:

13.92

NVDA:

20.50

PB Ratio

AB:

2.64

NVDA:

26.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

AB:

$250.00M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AB:

$250.00M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AB:

$252.50M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AB vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AB vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.24

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.48

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

5.89

-5.96

AB vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AB Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AB and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AB vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AB drawdown since its inception was -87.65%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AB and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.65%

-89.72%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-20.21%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-36.88%

+16.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

-66.34%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.08%

-66.34%

+8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.96%

-9.77%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.20%

-36.17%

+9.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

8.48%

-1.65%

Volatility

AB vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) is 4.19%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that AB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

12.97%

-8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

26.83%

-8.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

35.13%

-12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.24%

51.80%

-23.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.39%

49.87%

-17.48%

Dividends

AB vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.46%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

AB vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202220232024202520260
81.62B
(AB) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AB and NVDA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to AB (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AB dropped -87.65% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AB and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer