AAXJ vs. SPY
AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ returned 10.35%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
AAXJ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 25.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.35%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
AAXJ
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 25.79%
- 6M
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 47.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
AAXJ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 25.79% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | -20.35% | -5.73% | 23.35% | 17.93% | -15.04% | 41.76% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAXJ and SPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2008 | 0.72 |
The correlation between AAXJ and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AAXJ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAXJ
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AAXJ
SPY
Financial Services
AAXJ
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
AAXJ
SPY
Industrials
AAXJ
SPY
Communication Services
AAXJ
SPY
Basic Materials
AAXJ
SPY
Healthcare
AAXJ
SPY
Energy
AAXJ
SPY
Consumer Defensive
AAXJ
SPY
Utilities
AAXJ
SPY
Real Estate
AAXJ
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAXJ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
AAXJ
SPY
AAXJ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAXJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.67 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 11.92 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAXJ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAXJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -55.19% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -8.88% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -18.76% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.64% | -24.50% | -16.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.52% | -33.72% | -10.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -3.17% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -9.04% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 1.98% | +1.75% |
Volatility
AAXJ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 13.43% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAXJ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.43% | 4.87% | +8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 9.85% | +11.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.39% | 12.50% | +10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 17.15% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 17.95% | +2.56% |
AAXJ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAXJ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.32% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAXJ and SPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAXJ has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 10.35% for AAXJ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.
AAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.09% for SPY.
AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAXJ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer