AAXJ vs. MINV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. AAXJ is passively managed, while MINV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAXJ returned 23.41%/yr vs 33.92%/yr for MINV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MINV.

Performance

AAXJ vs. MINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 25.79% return, which is significantly lower than MINV's 55.42% return.

AAXJ

• 1D: -6.03%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 25.79%
• 6M: 26.97%
• 1Y: 47.85%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

MINV

• 1D: -7.65%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 55.42%
• 6M: 56.47%
• 1Y: 84.63%
• 3Y*: 33.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAXJ vs. MINV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	25.79%	31.53%	10.41%	4.79%	-2.08%
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	55.42%	30.85%	17.32%	-2.66%	-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and MINV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.91

The correlation between AAXJ and MINV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

AAXJ vs. MINV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAXJ	MINV
Technology	49.4%	67.2%
Financial Services	15.8%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	3.7%
Industrials	7.3%	19.2%
Communication Services	5.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.8%
Healthcare	2.6%	4.6%
Energy	2.2%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. MINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAXJ

AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 68
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 70
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

MINV

MINV Risk / Return Rank: 90
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAXJ vs. MINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAXJ	MINV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.93	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.44	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.51	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	7.80	-4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	19.55	-6.70

AAXJ vs. MINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the MINV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and MINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. MINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than MINV's maximum drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and MINV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAXJ	MINV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-23.49%	-25.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-10.91%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-19.82%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.03%	-7.65%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.00%	-8.03%	-5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	4.34%	-0.61%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. MINV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) is 13.43%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a volatility of 16.99%. This indicates that AAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAXJ	MINV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.43%	16.99%	-3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.20%	25.92%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.39%	29.06%	-5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	24.78%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	24.78%	-4.27%

AAXJ vs. MINV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. MINV - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than MINV's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	1.32%	1.81%	1.86%	1.95%	1.74%	2.21%	1.06%	1.83%	2.10%	1.99%	1.77%	2.44%
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF	0.97%	1.51%	0.25%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAXJ and MINV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AAXJ and MINV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AAXJ or MINV?

MINV has higher volatility (16.99%) compared to AAXJ (13.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs MINV's -23.49%.

Which ETF is better, AAXJ or MINV?

On 3-year performance, MINV leads with 33.92% vs 23.41% for AAXJ. On fees, AAXJ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAXJ or MINV?

Over the 3-year period, MINV has performed better with a 33.92% return vs 23.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAXJ or MINV?

AAXJ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MINV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAXJ or MINV?

AAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.97% for MINV.

What is the main difference between AAXJ and MINV?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.79% for MINV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.