AAXJ vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while EIPX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. AAXJ is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAXJ returned 24.49%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for EIPX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 31.17% return, which is significantly higher than EIPX's 21.96% return.

AAXJ

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 10.65%
• YTD: 31.17%
• 6M: 33.71%
• 1Y: 59.00%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

EIPX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 30.04%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	31.17%	31.53%	10.41%	4.79%	15.62%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	21.96%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and EIPX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between AAXJ and EIPX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAXJ	EIPX
Technology	41.6%	0.2%
Financial Services	17.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	-
Industrials	8.3%	4.2%
Communication Services	6.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Healthcare	3.0%	-
Energy	2.7%	69.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-
Utilities	1.8%	26.1%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAXJ

AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 84
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAXJ	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	2.71	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	3.82	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.46	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	7.32	-2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	20.31	-3.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAXJ	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	2.71	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	1.20	-0.91

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAXJ	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-15.43%	-33.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-4.12%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-15.43%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-2.58%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-2.27%	-11.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	1.49%	+2.04%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 4.01%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAXJ	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	4.01%	+4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.46%	8.50%	+8.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	11.17%	+9.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	15.06%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.25%	15.06%	+5.19%

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than EIPX's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	1.38%	1.81%	1.86%	1.95%	1.74%	2.21%	1.06%	1.83%	2.10%	1.99%	1.77%	2.44%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.68%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAXJ and EIPX in my portfolio?

AAXJ and EIPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAXJ or EIPX?

AAXJ has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to EIPX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, AAXJ or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, AAXJ leads with 24.49% vs 21.12% for EIPX. On fees, AAXJ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAXJ or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, AAXJ has performed better with a 24.49% return vs 21.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAXJ or EIPX?

AAXJ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAXJ or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.38% for AAXJ.

What is the main difference between AAXJ and EIPX?

AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EIPX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.