AAXJ vs. EIPX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX).
AAXJ and EIPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAXJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2008. EIPX is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022.
Performance
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 4.37% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | 15.62% |
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 21.23% | 11.44% | 19.11% | 10.74% | 0.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 21.23% return.
AAXJ
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 33.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
EIPX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAXJ vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank
AAXJ
EIPX
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAXJ | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.56 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.99 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.76 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 7.71 | +1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAXJ | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.56 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAXJ and EIPX is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison
AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than EIPX's 2.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.73% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.69% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and EIPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAXJ | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -15.43% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -14.87% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -1.91% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.14% | -2.29% | -11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.39% | +0.23% |
Volatility
AAXJ vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 3.00%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAXJ | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 3.00% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 8.15% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 16.32% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 15.19% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 15.19% | +4.81% |