AAUS vs. BBLU
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while BBLU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AAUS vs. BBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAUS having a 6.26% return and BBLU slightly higher at 6.55%.
AAUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBLU
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS vs. BBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 6.26% | 10.11% |
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 6.55% | 11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and BBLU is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. BBLU — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBLU
AAUS vs. BBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUS | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. BBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum BBLU drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and BBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -17.20% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.13% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -1.99% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. BBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | BBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 11.34% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 14.52% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 14.52% | -1.63% |
AAUS vs. BBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAUS and BBLU have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAUS vs. BBLU - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than BBLU's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | 1.18% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.68% | 32.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUS and BBLU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS and BBLU have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.35% for AAUS.
AAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BBLU is Large Cap Growth Equities.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and BBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer