PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASOX vs. HSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASOX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 26.02% return. Over the past 10 years, AASOX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.13% annualized return.


AASOX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
9.87%
6M
7.42%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
-2.53%
10Y*
8.71%

HSPGX

1D
1.59%
1M
7.31%
YTD
26.02%
6M
24.44%
1Y
68.10%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
9.87%5.89%8.12%16.49%-38.39%-5.07%67.18%29.36%1.47%28.73%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
26.02%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between AASOX and HSPGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1992

0.88

The correlation between AASOX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASOX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASOX
AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASOXHSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

5.07

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

21.39

-15.99

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASOX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASOXHSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.89

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.55

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.64

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.44

-0.21

Drawdowns

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASOX drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, which is greater than HSPGX's maximum drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASOX and HSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASOXHSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-60.28%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.34%

-14.41%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-28.63%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.50%

-38.65%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-41.48%

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.53%

0.00%

-37.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-19.01%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

3.39%

+2.12%

Volatility

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASOXHSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

7.62%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

19.24%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

25.33%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.35%

25.45%

+14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.44%

25.13%

+8.31%

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

AASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than HSPGX's 10.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.07%1.17%0.38%0.00%22.43%49.73%6.88%5.59%4.58%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
10.11%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AASOX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HSPGX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to AASOX (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASOX dropped -74.54% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASOX and HSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer