PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASOX vs. HSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASOX achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 34.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AASOX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 9.48%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.


AASOX

1D
0.62%
1M
8.80%
YTD
14.06%
6M
11.08%
1Y
29.50%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
-3.44%
10Y*
9.48%

HSPGX

1D
1.23%
1M
10.18%
YTD
34.80%
6M
30.34%
1Y
74.36%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
14.06%5.89%8.12%16.49%-38.39%-5.07%67.18%29.36%1.47%28.73%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
34.80%31.62%28.04%18.66%-24.65%3.59%38.49%28.33%-12.16%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between AASOX and HSPGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1992

0.88

The correlation between AASOX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASOX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASOX
AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HSPGX
HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AASOXHSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

5.38

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

22.46

-16.84

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASOX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASOX drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, which is greater than HSPGX's maximum drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASOX and HSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASOXHSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-60.28%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.34%

-14.41%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-28.63%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.50%

-38.65%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-41.48%

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.15%

0.00%

-35.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-18.98%

-10.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

3.43%

+2.11%

Volatility

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) is 8.70%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that AASOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASOXHSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

9.24%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.71%

20.44%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

26.53%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.47%

25.71%

+14.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.52%

25.25%

+8.27%

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASOX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

AASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than HSPGX's 9.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.03%1.17%0.38%0.00%22.43%49.73%6.88%5.59%4.58%
HSPGX
Emerald Growth Fund
9.45%12.74%21.85%6.43%8.77%19.11%8.48%1.45%11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AASOX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HSPGX has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to AASOX (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASOX dropped -74.54% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASOX and HSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer