PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASCX vs. TMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AASCX having a 15.09% return and TMSIX slightly higher at 15.19%. Over the past 10 years, AASCX has underperformed TMSIX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while TMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.


AASCX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.81%
YTD
15.09%
6M
14.56%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
10.67%

TMSIX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.85%
YTD
15.19%
6M
14.64%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
15.09%4.43%14.60%13.65%-17.85%27.70%21.68%24.51%-10.73%8.73%
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
15.19%4.64%14.08%13.90%-17.68%28.06%21.96%24.88%-10.47%18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AASCX and TMSIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

1.00

The correlation between AASCX and TMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASCX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASCX
AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TMSIX
TMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASCXTMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.44

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

8.82

-0.10

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the TMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASCX and TMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASCXTMSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.54

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.47

-0.09

Drawdowns

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, roughly equal to the maximum TMSIX drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and TMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASCXTMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-56.10%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.97%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-20.18%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

-31.57%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.67%

-40.66%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-10.00%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.48%

+0.01%

Volatility

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASCXTMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.52%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

10.87%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

14.29%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

20.42%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

20.46%

+0.40%

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASCX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison

AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than TMSIX's 10.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
13.01%14.98%9.22%1.54%3.15%12.54%3.54%2.92%12.94%0.09%0.10%0.00%
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
10.76%12.39%7.91%1.48%2.86%10.77%3.26%2.77%11.64%7.92%4.10%11.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, AASCX and TMSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TMSIX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to AASCX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs TMSIX's -56.10%.

TMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASCX and TMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer