PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
-16.40%-4.95%56.69%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
1.26%19.36%16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 1.26% return.


AAPX

1D
5.81%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
-16.40%
6M
-8.56%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.74%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXQTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.22

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

1.94

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.48

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.73

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

12.34

-11.76

AAPX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.22

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.62

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and QTAP is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AAPX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AAPX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-29.44%

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.67%

-12.04%

-29.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.06%

-0.51%

-25.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-5.21%

-14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.55%

1.68%

+15.87%

Volatility

AAPX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 0.76%. This indicates that AAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPXQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

0.76%

+10.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.63%

2.75%

+27.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.15%

16.31%

+46.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.31%

19.02%

+36.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.31%

19.02%

+36.29%