AAPX vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

AAPX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

AAPX

• 1D: -4.35%
• 1M: -5.29%
• 6M: 14.57%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 1Y: 87.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.35%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	$2.19M	$2.07M	$2.17M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M

AAPX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	11.18%	0.76%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and LINT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.08

AAPX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPX	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 68
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPX	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	—	—

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPX	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-69.02%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.02%	-62.23%	+41.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.65%	-24.07%	+5.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPX	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.74%	169.02%	-117.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.85%	169.02%	-113.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.85%	169.02%	-113.17%

AAPX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.60%	0.67%	21.46%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPX and LINT in my portfolio?

AAPX and LINT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPX or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPX or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPX or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.60% for AAPX.

What is the main difference between AAPX and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.97% for LINT.